Medição e Teste > Escalas Métricas e Réguas >
Escala De Aço Inox Starrett C636-500 500Mm Mm/Pol
Histórico de preços
As ²graphic designer and keen hobbyist crafts person I am constantly measuring things. I have collected rulers for years and continue to do so. Your analysis of the typography is spot on. A key feature for me is also the line thickness of the finer graduations. The markings on my 100ths ruler (Rawbone Chesterman) are thicker than the divisions, which, in the world of precision engineering is an oversight which could easily be fixed. Thank you a penetrating look at one of my pet hobbies.
You didn’t check them on a flat surface with a feeler gauge
Thanks, great vid
Very useful. Thank you
It’s imperial not US units…..just saying
Very helpful video. Thank you!
Don't bother with a ruler more "accurate" than 1/32. Anything smaller than that you should be using calipers to measure.
helpful video! thanks! I have a crazy, off-topic question for you. In the shots that you're looking directly at the camera and you can clearly see the ring from the light on your eyes, how did you stop it from glaring on your glasses?!?!?! i just picked up a good quality ring light and haven't used it because of the glare im getting. Please advise!
beh... inches...
What's your opinion about Shinwa ruler? As it Conforms to Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) B 7516 Grade 1
I totally agree with you about the Starrett, and wish the "black" was actually black. However it felt like your listing of the Starrett benefits were post-hoc. In other words, you chose the Starrett and then came up with the reasons you liked it.
Had a hard time getting past the pronunciation of Starrett he used. I did I appreciate the comparison & detail between the products however.
OK. That was amazing.
Maybe it's just me, but when I use a microscope, I just take off my glasses instead of removing the lenses from the frames.
Do you know of any pure metric rule
I never understood why people coo over Starrett tools. Then I got my hands on a combination square. It's light years better then any other square I've used. Yes it was price, but it's such a joy to use.
Great detailed analysis.
Another issue is durability: I have seen Starrett rulers that have been in a toolbox for 30 years and are still as easy to read as when they were brand new. You spend few bucks more but in pays in the long run.
The only rules which allow me to tolerate one of the dumbest measurement systems ever devised, that "Imperial" one, are rules which have 1/10th and 1/100th inch markings. Fractions are just plain stupid in any base other than ten when measuring. They allow measurements to be described using DECIMAL POINTS. https://www.amazon.com/s?k=rule+1%2F10&i=tools&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
I loved how you went into such detail in your comparison—that was great!
You didn’t check them on a flat surface with a feeler gauge
Thanks, great vid
Very useful. Thank you
It’s imperial not US units…..just saying
Very helpful video. Thank you!
Don't bother with a ruler more "accurate" than 1/32. Anything smaller than that you should be using calipers to measure.
helpful video! thanks! I have a crazy, off-topic question for you. In the shots that you're looking directly at the camera and you can clearly see the ring from the light on your eyes, how did you stop it from glaring on your glasses?!?!?! i just picked up a good quality ring light and haven't used it because of the glare im getting. Please advise!
beh... inches...
What's your opinion about Shinwa ruler? As it Conforms to Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) B 7516 Grade 1
I totally agree with you about the Starrett, and wish the "black" was actually black. However it felt like your listing of the Starrett benefits were post-hoc. In other words, you chose the Starrett and then came up with the reasons you liked it.
Had a hard time getting past the pronunciation of Starrett he used. I did I appreciate the comparison & detail between the products however.
OK. That was amazing.
Maybe it's just me, but when I use a microscope, I just take off my glasses instead of removing the lenses from the frames.
Do you know of any pure metric rule
I never understood why people coo over Starrett tools. Then I got my hands on a combination square. It's light years better then any other square I've used. Yes it was price, but it's such a joy to use.
Great detailed analysis.
Another issue is durability: I have seen Starrett rulers that have been in a toolbox for 30 years and are still as easy to read as when they were brand new. You spend few bucks more but in pays in the long run.
The only rules which allow me to tolerate one of the dumbest measurement systems ever devised, that "Imperial" one, are rules which have 1/10th and 1/100th inch markings. Fractions are just plain stupid in any base other than ten when measuring. They allow measurements to be described using DECIMAL POINTS. https://www.amazon.com/s?k=rule+1%2F10&i=tools&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
I loved how you went into such detail in your comparison—that was great!
Ficha Técnica e Modo de uso:
Escala de Aço Inox 500mm Starrett C636-500 MM/POL Referência: C636-500 Todas as escalas têm comprimento total em milÃmetros, exceto quando houver outra indicação.
As escalas podem ser: Inteiramente FlexÃvel Têmpera de Mola Adendo ao Número de Catálogo: Prefixo: C – Acabamento Cromo-Acetinado Sufixos: EM – Polegada / MilÃmetro ME – MilÃmetro / Polegada Escalas de Aço com Têmpera de Mola e Graduações em MilÃmetros e Polegadas Dimensões: 500 x 29 x 1,2mm Graduações: 0,5mm e 1/32" de um Lado; 1mm e 1/64" no Lado Oposto.
Nº EDP: 52636